logo logo
Home arrow Forums...
Friday, 10 February 2012
 
 
Main Menu
Home
Conscious Machines...
AI Techniques...
Neuroscience...
Researchers...
Publications...
Reviews...
MC Bibliography
Robotics Studio...
Forums...
Blog...
Frontpage
Upcoming Events
22.Feb. 2012

CogSys 2012
Vienna, Austria
04.Apr. 2012

TSC 2012
Tucson, Arizona
17.May. 2012

EAIS 2012
Madrid, Spain
05.Jun. 2012

Cognition & Consciousness
Menorca. Spain
02.Jul. 2012

ASSC 16
Brighton, UK
02.Jul. 2012

Revisiting Turing and his Test
Birmingham, UK
31.Oct. 2012

BICA 2012
Palermo. Italy
Tag Cloud
Associations Books Conferences Conscious Conscious Machines Consciousness Developer Documentación Documentation Español Machine Machine Consciousness Machines Neuroscience Positions Publications Research Researchers Reviews Robotics Robots Spanish Studio VPL
Spotlight
More
Reader's Preferred
MCexperts List
FAQs
Glossary
Site Map
 
Conscious-Robots.com Forum  


Raúl
Moderator

Moderator
Posts: 590
graph
Karma: 10  
Re:Turing Test - 2007/01/30 13:47 Turing test seems to be a good approach for theoretical discussions, but when it comes to test consciousness for an AI system like CERA [1] it is not applicable. In humans, usual criterion is Accurate Report. This is a behavioral index, as you ask the person to voluntary answer (verbally or any other way) to your questions about his/her perception. Again, this is not easy to extrapolate to other mammals or machines, where these kind of communicative/behavioral capabilities are not available.

Other criteria exist for consciousness in humans and mammals, which are based on brain physiology of consciousness (instead of external behavior). Seth et al. [2] offer 14 distinctive properties of a conscious brain (taking human brain as the reference). If your machine consciousness system is not an imitation of the underlying neural mechanisms in human brain, then these criteria cannot be applied. So, in an artificial system, lacking a thalamocortical core, what criteria for consciousness can we apply?

More oriented to the realm of machine consciouness, Aleksander and Dunmall ([3]) suggest a set of axioms for consciousness that a system should satisfy in order to be considered conscious of the world where it lives.


[1] http://www.conscious-robots.com/en/conscious-machines/machine-consciousness-projects/cera.html
[2] Anil K. Seth, Bernard J. Baars, David B. Edelman. Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2005). Pp. 119-139.
[3] Aleksander, I., Dunmall, B. Neccesary first-person axioms of neuroconsciousness. In: IWANN. Lecture Notes of Computer Science (2003). Pp. 630-637.
Raúl Arrabales Moreno. conscious-robots.com/raul
  The administrator has disabled public write access. Please, register to participate in the forum.

      Topics Author Date
    emo
Turing Test
Raúl 2006/11/26 14:00
    emo
thread linkthread link Re:Turing Test
Raúl 2007/01/30 13:47





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
 Conscious Robots RSS FeedConscious Robots RSS Feed

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on TwitterFollow us on twitter
Spotlight

Machine Consciousness Bibliography Database

 

ConsScale
The Cognitive Machine Consciousness Scale

 
Last Posts in Forum
 
CR
miel continental